Timeglass
When you compare agency time tracking software, start with the path from client work to a useful record. Timeglass and Keito both connect hours with projects. For an agency managing retainers, fixed-price work and frequent revisions, the key questions cover daily recording effort, budget control and billing.
Timeglass prepares timesheet drafts from captured computer work, with review and publication rules set by your workspace. Keito brings timers, expenses, staffing plans and invoicing into a connected workflow. This Timeglass vs Keito comparison covers public product information checked on November 5, 2026.
Which product fits your team?
Timeglass deserves a place on your shortlist when people switch frequently between client documents, messages and calls. Its desktop app uses the context of captured work to draft descriptions and suggest client, project and category assignments. The intended benefit is less time spent reconstructing a busy day. Your team still checks and corrects the result. Timeglass capture
Keito is a candidate when your search includes client billing software alongside time recording and resource planning. Its Business plan includes scheduling, and its invoice tools cover recurring billing, retainers and payment tracking. The flat workspace price can also appeal to a growing team. Choose the plan around the features you will use.
A software consultancy should also look closely at Keito's agent features. Configured Codex and Claude Code sessions can become project records, with measured model costs attached. That is useful when agent work forms part of a client engagement. Keito agent tracking
What should time tracking for agencies help you measure?
An agency needs to understand the hours a client consumes across delivery, account management and revisions. Group those records by the engagement your team actually sells, such as a monthly retainer or a fixed-price website. Clear descriptions help an account lead explain the work, and consistent assignment helps finance compare the recorded effort with the agreed fee. During the trial, check whether both people can answer their questions from the same project record.
How does each product record and review time?
A typical Timeglass day begins with the desktop app capturing permitted work. The resulting draft groups related activity and proposes its business context. People review the description, assignment and duration, then correct anything that needs attention. Work completed away from the computer may need a manual entry, subject to workspace permissions.
Keito's human timekeeping starts with a timer, a manual entry or imported calendar information. Employees can reuse recurring work and review their week before submission. Desktop timers support offline recording and later syncing. Approved or invoiced entries have editing restrictions that help preserve the billing record. Keito time recording
Keito's agent-session recording is a distinct input route. The repository or workflow needs a mapping, and the relevant session tooling needs configuration. Connecting an AI chat assistant gives it supported commands and access to records. Automatic recording depends on the configured capture route.
How do the main features compare?
The table describes the documented workflow. Plan permissions and your setup determine the details available to each person.
| Area | Timeglass | Keito |
|---|---|---|
| Time entry | The desktop app drafts entries from captured work, and people can add missing time where permitted. | People use timers, manual entries and calendar inputs, while configured agent sessions have a separate recording route. |
| Review and control | People review drafts, and workspace policy sets publication timing and manager access. | Team plans support submission and approval, with restrictions on approved or invoiced records. |
| Project finances | Recorded time and configured rates support budget and estimated project-profit views. | Reports cover time, expenses, billable amounts and project budgets, with scope varying by plan. |
| Billing workflow | Files can carry reviewed hours into a separate billing process. | Invoices support time, expenses, retainers and payment tracking. |
| Connected tools | AI assistants can use permitted records, and custom connections require setup. | The catalog includes work and accounting connections, with native integrations assigned to Business. |
| Team setup | Desktop deployment, project context and access policies shape the rollout. | Workspace roles support team access, and Business adds resource scheduling. |
Timeglass supports several project rate models, including client rates, person rates and category rates. Its financial views rely on the recorded time and configured costs. Confirm your firm's treatment of overhead and expenses before using a displayed project estimate for a financial decision. Timeglass project billing
Keito's billing tools deserve a separate trial if collection is central to your choice. Its invoice workflow includes branded documents, reminders and Stripe payment options, subject to eligibility and payment-provider charges. Keito invoicing
What should you budget?
Timeglass is $30/seat monthly or $25/seat with annual billing. Timeglass pricing
Keito lists Solo at $19 monthly, Pro at $49 per workspace monthly and Business at $199 per workspace monthly. Their annual-billing equivalents are $16, $39 and $159 per month. Solo covers one person; Pro and Business allow unlimited human users. Check the plan matrix for approvals, scheduling and the connections you need. Keito pricing
Include the work of setting up projects, moving historical entries and validating invoice output in your budget. A subscription price tells you one part of the cost; a short pilot gives you evidence about the time your team will spend maintaining the system.
What should you test before switching?
When evaluating project budget tracking software, run both products through a normal client week. Include interrupted tasks, a meeting, an expense and a correction made after review. Add an extra revision to a fixed-price project and check whether the team can see its effect on recorded effort and the estimated project result. Measure the time people spend keeping records, and check whether another person can understand the finished entries.
Review screenshot capture, app exclusions and access settings with employees before capture begins. Timeglass lets the workspace choose publication immediately, after a delay or following submission. This policy affects who can see work during the review period. Timeglass publication settings
Follow one reviewed entry through billing. For Timeglass, check the exported columns and your receiving system's import requirements. Its CSV, Excel and PDF files provide a practical handoff, and a live connection needs its own setup. Timeglass exports
How can you try Timeglass?
Start a 14-day Timeglass trial with a small group and a few active client projects. Agree on the access policy, review drafts each day and compare the finished record with the work you remember. That gives you a concrete basis for deciding whether automatic draft preparation earns its place in your team's day.
